BUILDING BRIDGES

So, I'm supposed to be excited because I got knighted last weekend. I probably would be if simply receiving a doctorate was my aim. Yet my goals are so big that I've had to build a bridge just to get them across. Meanwhile I am often haunted by the sense that I am lost in time and tumbling in space all because of my intent to be raised beyond average into the advantages that greatness brings. But it isn't advantage I seek but the chance to speak to the nation about our uncommon situation, which we mask because we shun the task reform requires, at least until Destiny hires us in its service. Only then are we able to see beyond the surface and the superficial, perceiving what is fundamental (and flawed), and which also gnaws at our hearts. Most people, however, refuse to acknowledge the pain, even in the dark when they are alone with themselves.

TURNS AND TONES

Waiting our turn changes our tone.

There is a time when we are shadowed and sheltered because the weather isn't fair enough for us to manifest what we possess deep within. So, billows of clouds accumulate and descend. Even then, however, others sense our presence but not our essence, our capacity to convey transcendence, going beyond what blocks them. Still, our light is yet dim. Yet "dim" must be endured if we want to be assured a place in the sun, which can only happen when our time comes. So many, however, believe that theirs has passed. So they live in the past, punishing their promise and potential, both of which are fundamental if our lives are to be guides for others to follow. If not, we live with circumstances which, metaphorically speaking, are hard to swallow.

TYING KNOTS

If it doesn't work keep working because you aren't finished.

It will work, especially if we are at our end. Most of us fail, however, because we aren't. On the contrary, many of us refuse to entangle in the interim knots that are inevitable. So, we double our dilemma by tying one in the middle, upholding what hinders our success.

SUCCESS AND SANITY

No one smiles when a friend is ill.

Sanity demands that we laugh at ourselves. In fact laughter heals the soul, according to Solomon. But if it persists it could signal sickness, because sane people don't let years lapse without pursuing their dreams. Nor do they don apish grins when asked about their goals. If so, their laughter is sickness not salutary. Sane people don't use humor to hide their hurts or to silence their haunts (indefinitely at least). This is a tactic of the insane who use mirth to mask their lunacy. Yet beneath their hearty humor is a hurting child in need of healing.

WORKING DREAMS

Moods prevent some and moats prevent others from transforming themselves.

Dreamers labor when failure follows. They battle because they are determined to succeed. In doing so, they create the conditions that nurture their dreams. Characteristically, they use luck when it falls and fear when it stalls and discourages. During these times, moreover, they celebrate themselves for enduring because they know just how easily failure discourages.

ON CONCEIT

Imagine having no habit that required no concern. Imagine being flawless and debt-free. How would you handle this mantle? Is conceit as inevitable as we say when too many things go our way? Or can we be accomplished without being tarnished thereby?

THE BLOCK

Rappers blame "the block" excessively. Everything fierce happens here. Girls get pregnant and guys get murdered for being on the wrong corner wearing the wrong colors. Metaphorically, the phrase conveys the miseries of poverty and the pursuit of fleeting gains. Other artists exploit "the hood" instead, stoking its streets with beats that embellish its quality.

LIVING PROOF

Living proof is harder than finding it. Hence, its rarity. Even so, some people are living proof despite the pressures that discourage. When they emerge they discipline our urge to deny our duty to embody.

DEBT AND DESTINY

Wishing is risky when destiny is listening.

Destiny demands what debtors don't, and isn't as willing to settle our account. In fact it sours when ignored and sabotages when denied. Though sympathetic, it rejects substitutes and insists on itself. Only by yielding do we appease it. Until then interest accrues and penalties punish us, though superficially our pursuits please us. In this regard, not even success soothes as we assert unless it serves destiny's ends.

OUR DEPICTIONS

Desire depicts what we invent for ourselves.

Desire dwells above demands that betray its aims. It yields occasionally yet maintains its distance until it accomplishes its intentions, enduring whatever denies its passion, accomplishing with patience what others abandon.

FAR ENOUGH

We seldom go far enough save to see others perform. Meanwhile our dreams remain still-born. We behave as if others are inherently better because we gather in coliseums and stadiums where we experiene the mayhem of greatness, and the sense of excitement that we desire for our lives; even if we don't want it to be that size. What matters is the sizzle.

ON FEARLESSNESS

A certain fear reinforces fearlessness. It may not be apparent but it is important to know. Otherwise we'll attribute a purity to bravery that nurtures cowardice.

EVERY STORY

Grit grows in dirt.

Every story strikes once it's told. In fact all of us could amaze if we could emerge from ourselves. In this regard, no success is one of a kind, but simply one of many possibilities. After all, J.K. Rowling (Harry Potter), could have very easily quit when trouble crushed.

DATING DESTINY

DESTINY FAVORS MONOGAMY. CELIBACY AND RESOLVE

What is your type? We're all supposed to have one. How do you like your dream --tall and dark or short and easy? Have you found one marriage-worthy or are you still waiting? If so, don't be rushed or ridiculed into choosing. Trust destiny instead to deliver.

ON BEING STERN

We must be stern when things obstruct. In yielding to opposition we exalt luck, courting rather than contending courageously. Meanwhile failure feeds its myth; yet winners confound it.

SO MUCH

So much of what we say is based on conjecture. So much of what we desire is rooted in illusion. So many of our dreams are as deeply doubted as they are desired. So much of our life is ambiguous, ambivalent, and still-born.

ON DECK

Are you on deck or at the desk? Have you a bat or are you still doing the undesirable? If the desk is the deck, then continue to sit. If not, how will you hit? Places matter, else there would be no batter's box.

THE URGE TO REGULATE

The urge to regulate represents a diversion of democracy and usurpation of the autonomy entrusted to citizens by reason and sanctioned by law. Thus “red-tape” has become the red-herring enabling governments to galvanize their efforts to prevent the emergence of truly free markets by manufacturing amorphous mechanisms that suppress the growth of cottage industries (and contrary ideas), which would ultimately enhance our ability to build a genuinely liberal and liberating society. If, however, this society sees itself as complete, then it is compelled to create oppressive protocols that stifle citizen’s efforts to implement their unique ideas.

This claim neither denies the need nor denounces the value of regulation as a means of managing public safety (e.g. Borders' attempts to retail his barbecue). However, it does substantiate his sentiment and sustain his argument that the regulatory state is effectually and efficiently becoming a new form of totalitarianism wherein only certain avenues are open to certain people with access to powers and persons that grant permits and permission for them to pursue their projects unimpeded.

Borders, however, launches a logical fallacy in his fertile comparison of over-regulation with applying for welfare, which is an equally arduous process. I also reject his reductionism, saying that, “In the end, all I wanted was to sell barbecue sauce.” In this regard, the relationship between ends and means are malleable. One feeds the other and informs both because of their bond. We just have to be Spartan to limit special interests from suppressing our pursuits which, unfortunately Borders wasn’t.

Characteristically, democracy and capitalism are constructed on contradictory, ambiguous and occasionally conflicting concepts supported by prescriptions and tempered by provisions designed for quality control. Concern with over-regulation, however, as expressed by Borders can become a form of “paper terrorism” whereby citizens are subverted by processes that require conformity to regulations multiplied beyond reason and without regard for commonsense. Perhaps a concept co-opted from philosophy might diminish the dominion of these mandates, namely, a revised version of Occam’s Razor, which would prevent “regulations from being multiplied unnecessarily in efforts to protect public interests.”

If this principle prevailed, the ability of special interests to suppress the emergence of entrepreneurial ventures by their vulturous actions would erode significantly. More important, such an approach would impugn the intellectual parochialism that imperils the progress of democracy, domestically and internationally. In this progressive climate oppressive provisions would cease to prevail, and yield rather to the rule of reason and the right of persons to pursue their peculiar projects in a climate of least resistance. Such a change, however, would require revision in the contemporary demeanor of American democracy, which routinely lets itself be bullied by global events that ultimately hinder citizen’s ability to exercise greater degrees of self-determination because of being deterred unjustly and illegitimately. Moreover, our allegiance to the logic of a flattened world seems to require inflexible systems that suppress rather than serve social interests and citizen needs, threatening freedom in the process.



References

Paper terrorism is the use of false liens, frivolous lawsuits, bogus letters of credit, and other legal documents lacking sound factual basis as a method of harassment, especially against government officials.[1] It is popular among some anti-government groups and those associated with the redemption movement. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_terrorism)

ON FRICTION

I have sat for days waiting for dawn to wave its wand over my life.

Friction is the option least taken. Given a choice, we refuse to chase what chafes. So, we pursue what chastens instead, chasing in leisure the excellence of others. Hence, our obsession with celebrity culture. How different would things be if we were as interested in ourselves as we are in these? Being so doesn't mean that we couldn't peek occasionally. But it would require us to own more honestly our charge, however hard the task or long the climb.

CROSSING OVER

Threaten fear and it will cheer us on.

Thresholds threaten but can't prevent our entry unless we doubt our chances. If so, we remain on the verge resisting the urge to crossover.